Monday, August 10, 2009
Employers have been warned to undertake more rigorous checks into candidates' backgrounds
The new civil penalty for employers who hire illegal immigrants has made a big difference to the UK Border Agency's activity in bringing cases against employers.
Failure To Conduct Adequate Pre-Employment Criminal Background Search Costs Assisted Living Facilty $750,000
A jury awarded $750,000 to a disabled man who was a resident at Cote De Neige Home for Adults after he was sexually assaulted by a worker at the facility. The lawsuit was brought against the assisted living facility for their failure to conduct an adequate pre-hiring background search before hiring a certified nursing assistant. http://www.nursinghomesabuseblog.com/2009/06/articles/litigation/failure-to-conduct-adequate-preemployment-criminal-background-search-costs-assisted-living-facilty-750000/
Everyday Cheapskate: Job applicants face new background check rules
Most employers now care more about a prospective employee's background. With so many applicants to choose from, employers can afford to be picky. What's new in background checks for job seekers is how prospective employers may view your social networking activities. What you post by way of text and photos to Facebook, MySpace and Twitter may well become included in your job application.
E-Verify Under Fire
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently announced that it will rescind a rule outlining actions employers should take when they receive a “no-match” letter from Social Security Administration indicating possible illegal employment… DHS indicated that it still intends to pursue more recently proposed rules that would require federal contractors to enroll in the government’s E-Verify system and check the work authorization of all new hires and all employees assigned to a federal contract.
When is it Safe To Hire Someone With a Criminal Record?
New Carnegie Mellon Study Provides Empirical Basis For Employers To Use in Assessment of Prior Criminal Records.
Schumer: Stricter background checks needed for those who work with kids
U.S. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., today proposed allowing summer camps, day care centers and non-profit groups to run criminal background checks through the FBI. Currently, Rochester-area agencies only can check employees and volunteers through state records, which may not include crimes against children in other states.
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Background checks to protect children - a man accused of sexually assaulting an 8-year-old boy he taught at a rec center also had been working with children at two Denver elementary schools. Read more
Band director charged with student rape - The director of the Delaware State University band has been charged with second-degree rape, two counts of third-degree unlawful sexual contact, and providing alcohol to an underage person. Read more
Man sold drugs at pizzeria- Police arrested a 31-year-old CiCi's Pizza manager who they believe may have been the main source of Ecstasy for Grapevine-Colleyville school district teens and operated out of the restaurant. Read more
Thursday, July 27, 2006
President George W. Bush on Thursday signed legislation that will establish a national sex offender registry and try to make it harder for sexual predators to reach children on the Internet.
The legislation, called the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, is named for Adam Walsh, a 6-year-old boy who was abducted 25 years ago on July 27, 1981, and eventually killed.
The boy's death prompted his father, John Walsh, to lead a long effort to seek greater protections against violence crime. He became host of "America's Most Wanted," a television show aimed at catching criminals.
"The bill I sign today will strengthen federal laws to protect our children from sexual and other violent crimes, will help prevent child pornography, and will make the Internet safer for our sons and daughters," Bush said in signing the new law in the White House Rose Garden.
The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children estimates that there are more than 560,000 registered sex offenders in the United States. About 100,000 are not registered or do not have up-to-date registrations.
The legislation will create a national sex offender registry, available to the public, to plug gaps in existing state systems and community notification requirements.
An offender who does not keep his registration up to date in any state in which he lives, works or attends school could face felony charges and up to 10 years in prison.
It will also create a registry for substantiated cases of child abuse or neglect to help law enforcement and child protective services.
Addressing concern about Internet predators and online pornography, the bill establishes education grants, and provides for 200 new federal prosecutors and 45 new computer forensic scientists to work on such crimes.
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
Cable Installers & Criminal Backgrounds - Charter Communications hired a contractor with a manslaughter conviction and an installer with a suspended driver's license and two orders of protection in his past. Read more
Nursing home worker checks can be lacking - Employee screenings get renewed attention after the case of a woman sentenced to jail for stealing elderly patients’ morphine. Read more
School hired murderer; state cancels license - The license of a private alternative school in Gresham, OR has been suspended after a teacher's aide was accused of rape and turned out to be convicted murderer.. Read more
Background check could have foiled embezzler - Man had three convictions when the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality put him in charge of handling payments for water permits. He later pled guilty to embezzling more than $180,000. Read more
Bill to track sex offenders in care homes - The Suffolk (New York) Legislature is expected to adopt a bill that will require nursing home operators to determine whether their employees, residents, volunteers and student interns are listed on the state's sex offender registry. Read more
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Food-stamp workers had criminal backgrounds - In a rush to find workers after Hurricane Wilma, Florida's Department of Children and Families hired dozens of temporary workers with criminal backgrounds to handle food-stamp applications that contained Social Security numbers and other personal information. Read more
Teen who says art teacher abused him sues board - A Miramar teenager who told police his middle school teacher molested him is suing the Broward School Board for negligence. Read more
Monday, April 17, 2006
Knowing is half the battle, especially for new hires - Workplace assaults total 2 million each year. Employee theft costs $40 billion annually and causes 30 percent of business failures. Lawsuits for negligent hiring are on the rise and can cost a company millions. Read more
More states consider guns-at-work legislation - Legislation being proposed in Georgia and Virginia that would allow licensed gun owners to legally store weapons in vehicles parked on company property may heighten fears of increased workplace violence incidents among area security directors. Read more
City jailer resigns in wake of investigation - A A Zanesville, Ohio corrections officer has resigned after an internal investigation revealed he has a history of sexual harassment and lied on his job application. Read more
RESUMES: JUST THE FACTS, PLEASE - A report released in 2005 by InfoLink Screening Services said that 14 percent of employees lied about education on their resumes. Read more
In Wake of Student's Murder, Lawmakers Press To Allow Officers To Work as Bouncers - Read more
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Oh, what a tangled résumé - People who write résumés are trying to market themselves. So like businesses advertising products, perhaps it's not surprising that they sometimes polish the truth. Companies that perform background checks on job seekers say perhaps 20 percent either make a false claim on their applications, or neglect to mention problems. Read more
Charter school principal is fired - The new principal of Buffalo United Charter School, who was arrested twice in four months in 2003 for allegedly threatening his estranged wife, was fired Friday. Charter school officials apparently had been unaware of Michael P. Carr's criminal background until it was brought to their attention by a Buffalo News reporter earlier in the day. Read more
Ice cream peddlers could face checks - Mr. Softee, beware. To sell your frozen treats, you and the Good Humor Man would have to undergo a background check under a measure that passed the House on Friday. Also under the dessert bill, sex offenders and certain convicted criminals would not be allowed to peddle treats if the bill becomes law. Read more
Seeking out criminal pasts - A report last month in the Detroit News showed the result of conducting criminal background checks on 200,000 current school employees in Michigan, as mandated by a school safety law that went into effect Jan. 1. More than 4,600 of the employees had committed criminal offenses, of which 2,200 were felonies. More than 100 of the crimes were sex offenses. Among current employees, 23 were convicted of homicide, 21 of armed robbery, 11 of child abuse, 10 of escaping jail or prison and 355 of drug felonies. Read more
Prep-school loss: Trusted friend and $1 million - Rex Stephen "Mr. Steve" Clark was like a son to William and Pouneh Alcott, someone they thought they could always count on. The relationship started when Clark enrolled his two children in the private school they founded, Lake Mary Prep. Soon, Clark was doing volunteer work. The Alcotts liked him so much, they added him to the payroll. Then they put him in charge. That's when things went terribly wrong. Authorities say he began stealing from the school, siphoning cash in small and large amounts during a 2 1/2-year period. He eventually took more than $1 million, police say. Read more
Rejection raises doubt about credit - The law requires companies to disclose the source of adverse actions against employees or potential employees, but only if the information came from an outside consumer-reporting agency. Read more
The Rules Have Changed for Corporate Criminals - Have You Ever Been Convicted of a Felony? Read more
40 known felons employed by the University of Wisconsin System Read more
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Kroll Inc., the global risk consulting company, announced today that it has completed the acquisition of InfoLink Screening Services, Inc., a leading, privately-held background screening company headquartered in Chatsworth, Calif., a Los Angeles suburb. InfoLink will operate as the West Coast hub office for Kroll’s Background Screening division, which is headquartered in Nashville, Tenn. Read more
Meth Taking Toll on Businesses, State
Meth use has increased among U.S. workers by 86 percent over the past five years. It also jumped 13 percent in the first half of 2005 among workers in jobs and industries required by the federal government to test employees in high-risk and safety-related positions.
Read more
Background checks get more important
Companies are relying more on pre-employment background checks to ease security concerns and protect against costly lawsuits. “It’s getting more important,” said privacy lawyer Robert Belair, editor of the Privacy and American Business newsletter. “The incidence of negligent hiring lawsuits is way up.” Read more
Background check nabs robbery suspect
Louisville police get break in Georgia. A man wanted in two armed robberies in Louisville was arrested yesterday after applying for a job at a charitable organization in Macon, Ga. Read more
Spherion temps indicted in fraud
Temporary workers who were assigned to Red Cross call centers by Spherion have been accused of giving away thousands of dollars intended for Hurricane Katrina. At least 17 workers placed at a Red Cross call center by Fort Lauderdale-based Spherion have been indicted on fraud charges, raising the issue of screening checks done by staffing agencies that supply temporary workers. Read more
Tuesday, December 27, 2005
Without a national database from which to retrieve information, and with no such system likely to be put in place any time soon, security and human resources personnel are relying on background screeners and their network of researchers to comb court documents and determine whether potential employees meet a company's hiring criteria. Read more
Who is checking the background checkers?
Some 80 percent of employers now require background checks for all potential employees, according to the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse (PRC), a consumer rights advocacy group in San Diego…. But what if a background check is in error? Read more
Day Care Background Checks in Backlog
After pre-schools and daycares hire teachers, they have to pass a background check if they're going to stay on the job. The process is supposed to be quick so that teachers with trouble in their past can be fired before they do any more damage. But the state agency handling the background checks is badly backlogged. The result is long delays. Read more
Football camps didn't check most workers
Six employees of the University of Colorado's youth football camp had criminal records that weren't discovered until after the camps had occurred - including one convicted of misdemeanor child abuse, according to a state audit released Monday.Read more
Church requiring background check for all personnel
When the New Year arrives, every member of the staff at the United Methodist Church of La Mirada and every Sunday School teacher, counselor and volunteer will have undergone a background check. It's just one of the policies instituted by the La Mirada church and all of the United Methodist churches in Southern California, Guam, Hawaii and Saipan as part of an effort to stem any sex abuse scandals that have rocked the Catholic Church from occurring in United Methodist churches. Read more
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
User-friendly tests and carefully thought-out assessments can help you find better candidates faster. Technology can’t make your hiring decisions for you, but effective online programs can add efficiency to your screening and candidate assessment processes. Used properly, these programs are particularly good at the early step of weeding out unqualified candidates. Read more
Private Schools May Check Workers - Lawmakers are considering plan for background inquiries.
High school referees, vending machine deliverymen and plumbers have to undergo extensive criminal background checks now under a new sex offender law if they do their work on public school property. Read more
Employment Screening – Justifying the Expense
Measuring cost per denial is an effective method of calculating the ROI of a company’s employment screening program.Read more.
Technology's Impact on Background Screening
Technology advances continue to impact the way we conduct business and are having a profound effect on the background screening industry. Advances in integrating information systems are creating the capability to access business information easily through one source, which is transforming background screening systems that have historically been standalone feeds.Read more.
Friday, August 26, 2005
Study Finds FBI Criminal Database Search Ineffective for Employment Background Checks
August 26, 7:45 am ET
DURHAM, N.C., Aug. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- As US employers increasingly utilize criminal background checks in their hiring process, the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) has identified one source of information that employers should avoid: the FBI Criminal Database.
In reaction to recent proposed federal legislation that would allow employers direct access to the FBI's database, NAPBS commissioned a study to evaluate the accuracy and completeness of this FBI criminal search.
The results were shocking.
The study found that in a significant percentage of searches, the FBI database returned erroneous or incomplete information.
The study, conducted by Craig N. Winston, an assistant professor of criminal justice at Sonoma State University, found that the FBI data lacks proper identifiers to credibly link a criminal hit with the subject of the investigation.
Another finding was the large number of missed records and false positives generated. For example, when analyzing a sampling of 93,274 background checks in the state of Florida, Winston's search revealed that the database missed 11.7 percent of the criminal records it should have identified. Even worse - of the more than 10,000 criminal records found, 5.5 percent of them were falsely attributed to those who were not convicted of a crime.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) compels employers to use the most up- to-date and accurate information when screening applicants for employment.
NAPBS co-chair Jason B. Morris says, "If employers are granted access to the FBI's data, they can easily be lulled into the false sense of security that they are availing themselves of the most accurate and comprehensive search available. As a result, they could be opening themselves to increased risk in the workplace and litigation from wronged job applicants."
Results from this comprehensive study can be found at http://www.napbs.com.
Founded as a non-profit trade association in 2003, the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) was established to promote ethical business practices, promote compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and foster awareness of issues related to consumer protection and privacy rights within the background screening industry.
Media Contact: Tracy Seabrook NAPBS 919.433.0123 info@napbs.com
Thursday, July 21, 2005
Pre-Employment Screening Articles
More and more employers require employee background checks, which is why it's no surprise more and more private companies are popping up offering to provide them. A Target Five Investigation shows it can be risky business. A bad background check nearly cost Eric Williams a job. Read more.
Protect Your Organization Against Negligent Hiring Suits
Speaking to a packed house June 20 during his session at the SHRM Annual Conference and Exposition, Nadell said that nothing takes the place of thorough applicant background checking. However, no background checking process is foolproof, so it's crucial for companies to know how to obtain the most accurate information while remaining compliant with the myriad federal and state laws that regulate the industry. Read more.
Friday, May 20, 2005
$10m filing names murder defendant and his employer
By Ralph Ranalli, Globe Staff - May 18, 2005
The family of slain Truro writer Christa Worthington has filed a $10 million wrongful death lawsuit against her alleged killer and the Cape Cod trash-hauling business that employed him at the time of the slaying, lawyers said yesterday.
Christopher M. McCowen, 33, was arrested last month and charged with Worthington's rape and murder after a DNA sample he gave voluntarily was matched to evidence found at the crime scene. At the time, McCowen was working as a hauler for the Cape Cod Disposal Co. , and made weekly visits to Worthington's Depot Road home to pick up her garbage.
In a lawsuit made public yesterday, a lawyer for Worthington's estate made a $10 million wrongful death claim against both McCowen and CCDC Equipment Services, Cape Cod Disposal's parent company, alleging that both were culpable in her death.
The lawsuit charges that Worthington suffered ''great pain of body and anguish of mind" at McCowen's hands and that Cape Cod Disposal ''had an obligation to use reasonable care in selecting and retaining its employees to be sent to the homes of its customers."
The company, the lawsuit alleges, failed to use reasonable care in hiring McCowen, ''who had a history of criminal and violent behavior including but not limited to burglary, grand theft, trafficking in stolen property, felony assault, and threats to women which resulted in the issuance of restraining orders."
By hiring McCowen, the company put him in a position to familiarize himself with Worthington's home and routine, the lawsuit contends.
Weymouth lawyer Chester Tennyson Jr. confirmed yesterday that he filed the lawsuit earlier this month on behalf of Worthington's estate, which is administered by her father, Christopher Worthington, and BankNorth. Worthington's daughter, Ava, who was 2 years old at the time of the killing and was found clinging to her mother's lifeless body, is a beneficiary of the estate.
Tennyson said he would have no comment on the Barnstable Superior Court lawsuit and that he had asked Worthington's relatives to refrain from talking, as well.
''We'll do our only talking in the courtroom," he said.
Francis O'Boy, McCowen's Taunton-based lawyer, also declined to comment on the lawsuit yesterday. A lawyer for Cape Cod Disposal, however, said that the company admits no liability and plans to aggressively defend itself in the lawsuit.
''First of all, it has to be proven that he [McCowen] committed the act he is accused of committing," lawyer Bruce Bierhans said. ''Then the family has to prove that my client could not only have foreseen the crime, but could also have prevented it. Under Massachusetts law, the family has a very substantial burden of proof."
''This is not a nursing home or a day-care center; they are hiring people to pick up garbage," Bierhans said. ''We believe, and it will be our position in court that Cape Cod Disposal was fully in compliance with all of their obligations under the law."
In the criminal case, a state judge yesterday rejected O'Boy's petition that McCowen be released on $50,000 cash bail and ordered him to remain in jail pending trial.
According to recently unsealed court documents, McCowen insisted to police last year that he did not kill Worthington.
State Police investigators interviewed McCowen twice, once three months after the January 2002 slaying and again two years later. After the second interview, McCowen volunteered to have a sample of his DNA taken by swab. That sample was matched last month to DNA taken from Worthington's body, according to court documents made public yesterday.
According to the affidavit, McCowen said he had limited contact with Worthington; although he went to her house every Thursday, he said he did not know her and never went inside.
''Chris McCowen stated that Christa Worthington would occasionally watch him from inside her home through the front door and would sometimes wave," Trooper Christopher S. Mason wrote of the 2002 interview in an affidavit filed two months ago in support of the murder charges against McCowen.
© Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
Monday, April 25, 2005
Pre-Employment Screening Articles
David Shadovitz, Human Resource Executive
A new book released by the Institute for a Drug Free Workplace in Washington reveals that employers are winning most drug testing related court battles. Employers prevailed in roughly two-thirds of the nearly 1,200 legal decisions on drug testing, according to the book, 2004-2005 Guide to State and Federal Drug Testing Laws.
In the last year,” says Gina M. Petro, counsel to the institute and a co-author of the guide, “87 court decisions upheld drug testing, and 46 did not.” Since the group began tracking suits in the mid-1980’s, employers prevailed in 825 cases, while challenges have been successful in only 374 cases. The numbers are somewhat higher for federal court cases, in which employers have prevailed 76 percent of the time.
Criminal background checks incomplete How convicted felons can slip through safety net
By Bob Sullivan, Technology correspondent, MSNBC
Updated: 5:06 p.m. ET April 12, 2005
Is there a felon in the next cubicle? What about in your child's afterschool athletic league?
Employers and volunteer organizations are increasingly turning to national commercial database searches provided by private firms to ferret out potential convicts from their ranks. The searches are quick, inexpensive, and promise nationwide coverage -- in theory, preventing convicted felons from moving away from a checkered past.
But experts say the nationwide tallies are often full of holes, and contain as few as 70 percent of all felony conviction records, leading in turn to a false sense of security. Read article at MSNBC.
Thursday, April 14, 2005
LexisNexis Says Thieves May Have Breached Computer Files Containing Information of 310,000 People
Criminals may have breached computer files containing the personal information of 310,000 people, a tenfold increase over a previous estimate of how much data was stolen from information broker LexisNexis, the company's parent said Tuesday.
Last month, London-based publisher and data broker Reed Elsevier Group PLC said criminals may have accessed personal details of 32,000 people via a breach of its recently acquired Seisint unit, part of Dayton, Ohio-based LexisNexis. LexisNexis is a Reed subsidiary.
Reed said it identified 59 instances since January 2003 in which identifying information such as Social Security numbers or driver's license numbers may have been fraudulently acquired on thousands of people. Read article…
Monday, April 11, 2005
Pre-Employment Screening Articles
Criminals are learning that the primary identifier in court records is date of birth and that they can conceal their past by providing a false DOB. In his new book “Sleuthing 101, Background Checks and The Law,” Barry J. Nadell, President of InfoLink advises employers to always conduct a motor vehicle report as part of their background screening program… even if the job position does not include driving. Read more…
Lack of Background Check Leads to Liability
Blair v. Defender Services Inc., 4th Cir., No. 03-1280, Oct. 25, 2004. A college student was allowed to pursue her claims for negligent hiring and retention against a janitorial staffing service after allegedly being attacked by an employee of that service, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held. Read more…
Bad Data Fouls Background ChecksWhile recent news has folks concerned about identity theft, inaccurate data is just as big a danger -- and individuals are left to police the problem themselves. Read more…
Hiring Presents Tricky Areas for Employers
A welter of federal and state laws and legal decisions — and fears of lawsuits — have put tight constraints on what information you can ask someone you're considering for a job, or what information you can give about a former employee. Read more…
Banking body lists security breaches amid data fears
Amid growing concern about identity theft, a US banking regulator on Thursday detailed several instances of security breaches at banks and previewed new guidelines on when banks must tell the customers about such lapses. Amy Friend, assistant chief counsel at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, said that in one instance, the agency “directed a large bank to improve its employee screening policies” after determining that the bank had “inadvertently permitted a convicted felon, who engaged in identity theft-related crimes” to become an employee.
Sunday, March 20, 2005
By Joseph Menn, LA Times, March 13, 2005
The data-collecting company has managed to avoid being bogged down by regulations -- until maybe now.
ALPHARETTA, Ga. — ChoicePoint Inc. was created to avoid just the sort of mess in which it now finds itself.
The nation's biggest private collector of personal information was spun off seven years ago from credit bureau Equifax Inc. largely to get around laws restricting the way such bureaus sell data.
Because it was not considered a financial services company, ChoicePoint was not subject to data laws, and for years the plan worked like a charm.
Freed from regulation, the company saw sales more than double — and its profit and stock price more than quadruple — as businesses demanded more data to manage risks and target marketing. ChoicePoint became the quintessential Information Age company, culling all manner of sensitive facts and figures about virtually every adult in the United States, some 19 billion records in all.
But in the wake of a security breach that allowed a ring of identity thieves to peruse tens of thousands of those records, ChoicePoint suddenly faces the sort of government oversight that it and similar companies have sought to avoid.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators are investigating ChoicePoint's practices. Last week, the Senate Banking Committee held the first in a series of congressional hearings. Legislators and industry experts predict new regulation of ChoicePoint and competing information brokers that compile and sell Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers and financial histories to tens of thousands of customers, including lenders, landlords and many of the Fortune 500.
"It's very unfortunate," said former ChoicePoint Vice President Catherine Aldrich. "They are a victim of a really heinous crime, and they are going to be really penalized — the whole industry is."
Privacy advocates disagree, saying ChoicePoint brought the prospect of more vigorous regulation on itself with an aggressive push to find new customers. They note that the recent breach was only the most widely publicized and that ChoicePoint has erred before — as during the 2000 election, when it was hired by the state of Florida to run background checks on voters.
Chief Executive Derek V. Smith and other company officers declined repeated interview requests, as did company directors.
In regulatory filings and news releases, though, the company has said it is cracking down on potential identity thieves by turning away some customers, giving up a projected $15 million to $20 million in annual revenue. Last year, the company posted profit of $148 million on sales of $919 million.
In a statement to Congress last week, ChoicePoint said it could live with some measure of new regulation. In the past, information brokers have offered support for legislation and then succeeded in watering it down, according to a new book on the industry, "No Place to Hide: Behind the Scenes of Our Emerging Surveillance Society" by Robert O'Harrow Jr.
Information Raid
The latest problems erupted when con artists posing as small-business owners looked up sensitive information on 145,000 individuals.
ChoicePoint then made several missteps. Forced to notify California consumers under a law that took effect in 2003, ChoicePoint initially said only 35,000 state residents were at risk. Only later did it acknowledge the national scope of the breach. After that, CEO Smith said the incident was the first of its kind. But The Times soon discovered that, in fact, a similar episode had occurred in 2002.
Meanwhile, ChoicePoint still hasn't checked for people who might have been victimized before the California law went into effect.
All in all, ChoicePoint's handling of the affair has only added to the chorus calling for tighter regulation.
"They probably were too cavalier about it," said analyst Brandt Sakakeeny of Deutsche Bank Securities. "They didn't expect the firestorm that they've got."
That might be because despite all the company's knowledge about the people in its databases, ChoicePoint has few direct dealings with them.
The same isn't true of Equifax, Experian Ltd. and Trans Union Corp., which must address errors in the credit reports they compile. Although ChoicePoint resells information from the three bureaus, it doesn't have to take responsibility for the content.
That legal loophole, which Congress may soon shut, has been a tremendous boon to ChoicePoint. And the company has benefited from the wording in other laws as well. Financial institutions, including banks and other lenders, face much more onerous regulation about what they can do with customer data. ChoicePoint says it doesn't meet the definition of a financial institution.
"There are a lot of dark crevices in the law that need to be opened up and filled in," said Daniel Solove, author of "The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age."
ChoicePoint has flourished by exploiting such regulatory weak spots, even in insurance services, its oldest and most profitable line of business. The company keeps a database of insurance claims by holders of auto and homeowner policies. Insurers submit those records to the database and check new applicants against it.
State Sen. Jackie Speier (D-Hillsborough) and other critics say that consumers often don't know the database has been tapped or what's in it; that the files can include errors that go uncorrected; and that insurers even count simple inquiries that don't lead to the filing of a claim as a strike against policyholders.
Speier, who pushed a 2003 bill that would have curtailed the practice, maintains that insurers sometimes use the information to discriminate against customers. The state Insurance Department says one insurer, for example, refused to cover a San Francisco homeowner who had once asked her agent if she was covered for a clogged pipe.
Data and More Data
More frequent targets for critics have been ChoicePoint acquisitions that specialize in collecting widely dispersed public records, including legal judgments, liens and voter registration information, and then tying them to more sensitive data such as Social Security numbers and driver's licenses.
ChoicePoint bought Santa Ana-based CDB Infotek in 1996, shortly before spinning off from Equifax, and added Database Technologies Inc. in 2000. The next year, Database Technologies came under fire for having given Florida election officials a list of thousands of suspected felons that state officials used to bar people from voting.
The list was riddled with errors, and many of the accused were black Democrats. At least 1,000 people were improperly kept from voting, more than George W. Bush's margin of victory. The NAACP sued. ChoicePoint blamed Florida officials for asking for near-matches without making confirmation checks on their own. ChoicePoint settled the case in 2002 and agreed to reprocess its list of suspected ex-cons.
Although ChoicePoint's government deals generate only about 10% of revenue, Sakakeeny said, the company made the area a top priority after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and the firm won a four-year, $67-million contract with the Justice Department. Local police, the FBI and other agencies are big customers, in part because laws prevent the authorities from keeping close tabs on those who aren't suspected of a crime.
"These government agencies are increasingly outsourcing various law enforcement and intelligence functions," Solove said. In a sense, he added, the government doesn't even need its own surveillance program. "It can achieve the same goal by having these companies do the work for them."
Yet ChoicePoint's government work has brought criticism from civil liberties groups.
"Individuals need to give their information to third parties in order to participate in society," Chris Hoofnagle, an attorney with the Electronic Privacy Information Center, wrote in a law journal last year. "It is unfair to cede all individuals' rights to a company that can simply hand over personal information to law enforcement."
Several foreign governments also launched investigations after ChoicePoint acquired secret information on their citizens. Mexico placed three accused middlemen under house arrest for their suspected roles in helping ChoicePoint buy the entire country's voting rolls, which are protected under federal law.
Despite the backlash, ChoicePoint has indicated that it wants to go much further in mining for information. The company has been working on a secret database prototype for the FBI. And Smith, the CEO, has pressed for the expansion of DNA collection from criminals and others, as well as for parents to take DNA samples from their children.
"In the near future, identity, so weakened by fallible representations like birth dates and Social Security numbers, will be anchored by infallible genetic markers," Smith wrote in his 2004 book "Risk Revolution."
Although such sentiments have alarmed privacy advocates, ChoicePoint has taken the most flak for the way it peddles far more workaday information.
The Nigerian fraud rings that repeatedly penetrated ChoicePoint's databases passed themselves off as legitimate small companies interested in tapping people's addresses, phone listings, Social Security numbers and credit reports.
The company stresses that it doesn't grant access to information to just anybody. But it has opened its arms much wider in recent years.
Backgrounds Exposed
The clearest case is a product called Employee Background Check, which was sold in 2003 to the general public at Sam's Club stores for less than $40. ( ChoicePoint's lead outside director, Thomas Coughlin, recently retired as vice chairman of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., where he oversaw the U.S. operations of Sam's Club.) The kit, since pulled from the market, featured many of ChoicePoint's databases and allowed customers armed with someone else's Social Security number to look up identifying information and possible criminal records.
Ostensibly aimed at employers, the product did little to weed out nosy neighbors or crooks.
The package came with a seal reading "Business License Required." But the online registration forms, which took less than half an hour to complete, didn't ask users to submit a license number, according to Pam Dixon, founder of nonprofit research group World Privacy Forum.
And though users were supposed to have the approval of purported job candidates for some searches, all ChoicePoint demanded was that customers check an electronic box marked "candidate authorization obtained?"
The company told users they might be audited, but Dixon said she bought a kit and never got so much as a phone call asking who she was.
"It was the single most insecure background check product I have ever seen in my life," she said.
In some eyes, the Sam's Club sales exemplified ChoicePoint's drive to trade wider access to its information for greater revenue.
"The public records side had really stagnated," said Aldrich, the former vice president, who now works at an employee-screening firm. Even so, she called the kit decision "a really odd thing."
CEO Smith has called for a broad discussion of how the increased flow of information can be used for good and ill.
"The electronic 'pipeline' is not the problem," he wrote. "The problem is society's continuing delay in implementing consistent, coherent standards and guidelines to monitor and protect the flow."
But by putting profit above all else, some analysts say, Smith has lost his shot at driving that conversation.
"They should have taken a stronger leadership role on the process, in who they disclose to," said Gartner Inc. financial security analyst Avivah Litan. "Companies like ChoicePoint can't see the forest for the trees."
*
Times staff writer David Colker and researchers John Tyrrell and Penny Love contributed to this report.
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
Fraud Ring Taps Into Credit Data
L.A. Times
Data theft case widens; 750 fraud victims found
MSNBC
Californians warned that hackers may have stolen their data
USA Today
Saturday, February 05, 2005
(Alexandria, Va., February 3, 2005)—Nearly 40 percent of HR professionals report that over the last three years they have increased the amount of time spent on reference checking for potential employees, according to the 2005 Reference Checking Survey released by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM.)
Most organizations conduct reference and background checks as part of their screening process. Seventy-three percent of survey respondents say that reference checking is somewhat or very effective in identifying poor performers.
“Being able to identify unqualified candidates during the recruiting process saves organizations time and money,” said Susan R. Meisinger, SPHR, president and CEO of SHRM. “Employees provide the competitive edge for a successful business, making it critically important for organizations to be able to recruit the right people. With new technologies, reference and background checking has become easier to conduct and increasingly more important to organizations who want to get a complete picture of the job candidates they consider hiring.”
Ninety-six percent of organizations conduct some kind of background or reference check. Although much reference checking is conducted in-house, 52 percent of survey respondents report that their organization outsources at least part of their reference checking or verification.
Survey respondents report that reference checks have found inconsistencies in areas including certifications, eligibility to work in the United States, degrees conferred, schools attended, and malpractice or professional disciplinary action. The most common inconsistencies - found by about half of survey respondents - are inconsistencies in dates of previous employment, criminal records, former job titles, and past salaries.
Organizations are responsible for checking the references of potential employees, but also are asked to provide reference information about former employees. Due to a fear of liability, 54 percent of organizations have policies to not provide employee references. Yet, 75 percent of HR professionals believe their organization would share more information about current and former employees if there were laws clearly protecting them from legal liability.
The survey was based on 345 responses from a random sample of SHRM members.
###
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest association devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 190,000 individual members, the Society's mission is to serve the needs of HR professionals by providing the most essential and comprehensive resources available. As an influential voice, the Society's mission is also to advance the human resource profession to ensure that HR is recognized as an essential partner in developing and executing organizational strategy. Founded in 1948, SHRM currently has more than 500 affiliated chapters and members in more than 100 countries. Visit SHRM Online at www.shrm.org
Monday, December 06, 2004
Pre-Employment Screening Articles
San Jose Mercury News, CA
Arizona brass did not conduct a criminal background check on Backman before hiring him and were not aware that he had been arrested for driving under the influence...
Background checks save costly errors
The News Journal, DE
By the time a new employee takes their lunch break on the first day at work, a company has paid that person more than the cost of the background check ...